LISTEN TO ARTICLESynthesized Narration • 0:00 / 0:00

Many believe that interviews are simply for inspiration, human interest, or lifestyle features. Broadcasters choose to highlight rags-to-riches stories, but the pain of past manipulation continues to linger, resistant to the comfort of feel-good narratives. Here is the catch: denying wrongdoing does not actually restore trust, it just makes the controversy fade from headlines while credibility suffers. When journalism bends its spine to favor convenience or profit, betrayal of the people is at risk. Until now, the issue of paid interviews remains a gray area—hidden behind vague defenses and claims as mere content. Recently, in a Facebook post on August 21, Pasig City Mayor Vico Sotto questioned why Sarah and Curlee Discaya, figures linked to the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) projects, found themselves comfortably featured in shows by veteran broadcasters Korina Sanchez and Julius Babao. In his words, why would anyone spend P10 million just to appear on these programs? Bear in mind that it is not the price that matters, but the culture of pay-to-play publicity that erodes the essence of journalism. Sotto’s argument was not about politics alone but about restoring faith in media that claims to serve the masses. However, the defense from Sanchez’s camp was quick: they called the remarks slanderous, even cyber libel. They insisted their shows uphold editorial standards and that the Discaya feature was never meant to be investigative, only inspirational. Babao stated the same, clarifying that his YouTube interview aired months before the Discayas even entered politics. He denied any suggestion of the P10 million being involved. Despite such defenses, the cracks are still glaring. In cases where these figures are later tied to political or questionable dealings, journalists face criticism for having unwittingly helped polish their image in the end. When they hand over their platforms without scrutiny, they lend legitimacy that can later be weaponized. The result is not just blurred lines but damaged trust. And when trust breaks, it is not the broadcasters alone who fall—it is the people’s faith in the media as a whole. The lesson here is simple. Media professionals carry immense influence, and with it, the responsibility to preserve credibility. Disclosure is crucial, but so is discernment—understanding when a feature risks becoming an inadvertent promotion. In an era when information often fades into advertising, the need for clear boundaries and stronger accountability in journalism has never been greater.