LISTEN TO ARTICLESynthesized Narration • 0:00 / 0:00

When the goal becomes survival, education becomes impossible. In recent events, the Department of Education, led by Secretary Sonny Angara, is planning to implement makeup classes—possibly on Saturdays or after regular hours—to address learning loss caused by class suspensions due to southwest monsoon flooding. While class suspension decisions remain under the discretion of both DepEd and LGUs, the ARAL program will also be launched this school year to support students struggling with literacy and math. But should learning recovery come at the cost of rest, equity, and well-being? When cyclones Bising, Crising, and Dante struck 1,460,986 families, or 5,299,299 individuals, were affected in 5,833 barangay (villages) across 17 regions. Over 86,000 people were displaced, with 57,555 families seeking shelter in evacuation centers and 29,502 families staying with relatives or in makeshift arrangements outside official shelters. And ravaged communities, drowning homes and displacing families, the response remained predictable—suspend classes now, make up for them later. The system once again shoved the burden of recovery onto the backs of learners and teachers. But when flooded houses become classrooms and stress becomes a daily companion, this is no longer education. It is exploitation disguised as duty. A burnt-out mind learns nothing. Make-up classes—whether scheduled during suspension days, held after regular hours, crammed into Saturdays, or squeezed into what used to be the mid-year break, do not symbolize progress—they symbolize desperation. Some students have no electricity, no signal, no space to sit, and no dry clothes. Others are wading through floodwater or staying in evacuation centers. How can genuine learning take place in conditions unfit for even basic living? Teachers are not machines. While students are pushed past their limits, so are the very people expected to teach them. Lesson planning, checking outputs, and managing digital platforms—now with added make-up requirements—drain the spirit from already overworked educators. Rest is not laziness. Breaks are not rewards. When everyone is stretched too thin, quality collapses. And when quality collapses, what exactly are we trying to make up for? Some argue that these measures are necessary to ensure learning continuity. Republic Act No. 9155, also known as the Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001, mandates the Department of Education to ensure access to, promote equity in, and improve the quality of basic education. Meanwhile, Article XIV, Section 1 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution declares that “The State shall protect and promote the right of all citizens to quality education at all levels and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all.” These are not suggestions, these are obligations. So when natural disasters rob students of their classroom hours, the system must respond not with excuses, but with action. Make-up classes are not merely a stopgap—they are a constitutional necessity. If the goal is to truly uphold quality education, then lost days must be reclaimed with the same urgency as lives during a flood. We cannot glorify “resilience” yet leave our students drowning in learning loss. No child can master competencies from a classroom they never sat in. If education is a right, then time to learn is sacred. Protecting that time, even if it means stretching the calendar, is not cruelty—it is justice. While learning recovery is necessary, quality cannot be measured by quantity alone—not when conditions are unstable and well-being is at risk. In times of calamity, learning must not be rushed. It must be reimagined. Time lost to disasters cannot be reclaimed by robbing rest. Education should not be measured by the number of hours spent in class, but by the understanding gained. Long days do not equal deep learning. Exhaustion does not breed excellence. This crisis is not about time—it is about misplaced priorities. Instead of forcing the education system to bend around floods, the government should be fixing the floods. Where is the investment in disaster-proof infrastructure? Where is the action on climate resiliency? Why must learners and teachers adjust, when the state refuses to? The failure is not in the calendar—it is in the leadership. No one comes out of a storm ready to recite formulas. Before students catch up, they need to catch their breath. Because this isn’t just about missed lessons—it’s about people barely holding on. The solution is not to steal more time but to protect the time that matters. The Department of Education must provide flexible, offline modules for calamity-affected areas to ensure that no learner is left behind due to poor connectivity or unstable conditions. The national government must invest in disaster-resilient school infrastructure to reduce disruptions and keep education going even during extreme weather events. School administrators must adopt trauma-informed policies to protect the mental health and well-being of both students and staff, especially in the aftermath of crises. Lawmakers and education planners must craft a crisis-responsive school calendar that adjusts based on regional realities—not rigid, one-size-fits-all timelines—to reflect the true pace of recovery. Because if this pattern continues—if burnout becomes the norm and disaster response remains reactive—education will not survive the next storm. Time is up. Neither typhoons nor the collapse of this system will wait. You don’t teach someone to swim while they’re already drowning.